arXiv preprint ·
Chronologic: Measuring Language Models' Ability to Represent the Past
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Language models are appealing tools for research on the past. But to trust the evidence a model provides, researchers need to know whether its responses fit the period represented. Validation is challenging, because this is not a task living people ordinarily perform, and because many questions have multiple correct answers. We use historical texts to develop a benchmark for a model's representation of English-language contexts 1831-1930, relying on pairwise comparisons to multiple ground truths and strong distractors to score the hardest questions in an appropriately graduated way. We find that generative tasks are harder than discriminative ones; in fact, reasoning models can typically discern the weakness of their own generated answers. While models pretrained exclusively on historical text lead the pack when evaluated by answer likelihood, they cannot compete with commercial models in free generation. None of the models we tested represent historical contexts in a fully persuasive way yet, but progress toward that goal is evident.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
COT-TTS: Audio Context-Aware Text-to-Speech with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
CTRL: Control-Based Time Series Forecasting with LLM-Guided Residual Learning
LLaDA-PRM: A Bidirectional Step-Level Reasoning Evaluator
Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics
Analyzing Public Discourse on Urbanism: Topic Clustering, Sentiment Analysis and Retrieval-Augmented Generation using YouTube Comments
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.