arXiv preprint ·
When Agentic Trust Crosses Organizational Boundaries: Structural Externalization and a Reference Model for Trust Evidence
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Agentic systems increasingly invoke tools, services, data, and other agents across organizational boundaries, yet a relying party cannot assess a delegated action solely from producing-domain controls and records. This paper develops Trustworthiness as a Service (TaaS) through a synthesis of trustworthy-AI governance, agent security, distributed trust management, identity, provenance, assurance, and control-plane research. The analytical unit is a cross-domain reliance proposition that names the issuer, subject and action, relying party, administrative boundary, evidence dependencies, adverse condition, and required verification or adjudication semantics. The three-condition structural-externalization diagnostic identifies propositions that depend on multiple domains, require producer-independent reliance, and must remain reviewable after revocation, failure, conflicting records, or dispute. For such propositions, the paper specifies a trust-evidence envelope: an immutable workflow manifest linked to append-only, issuer-attributed attestations for task-scoped authority, policy and execution decisions, provenance, validity, disclosure, status, challenge, and recovery. A topology-neutral logical reference model assigns these functions to explicit roles and trust domains. Three analytical scenarios and the TaaS-Eval protocol proposal define manifests, independent consumers, hard gates, adversarial evidence tests, metrics, and reproducible artifact reporting. By composing established identity, authorization, provenance, assurance, and governance mechanisms around a bounded delegated action, TaaS provides a reusable profile for cross-domain reliance. It makes evidence dependencies, independent verification, challenge, and recovery explicit, supporting interoperable governance and future evaluation without treating producer assertions as ground truth.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
From Capability to Assurance in Autonomous Penetration-Testing Harnesses: A Framework and Reference Implementation
Specification Before Generation: A Pre-Registered, Five-Model Paired Evaluation of a Specification Frame for LLM-Generated Code in Money, Time, Idempotency, and Access Tasks
MATE: Policy-Aware Security Auditing for Mobile Agents via Synthesis-Driven Trajectory Learning
StyleAT: Defending Face Recognition Against Semantic Attacks
SelfOp: An Optimization Algorithm for Self-Improving Security Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.