arXiv preprint ·
Beyond Linear Context: Graph-Guided Evidence Navigation for Long-Novel Reasoning with a Local 9B Language Model
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Long-context models read a novel the way a person reads a printout: one token after another, in narrative order, with the whole history competing for a fixed budget of attention. A detective does not work that way. They sort what happened when, and they keep a map of who relates to whom, so a clue from chapter one can meet a question asked at the end of the book. We test whether a frozen knowledge graph can give a small local model that same freedom. Thirty detective novels and 234 multiple-choice questions are answered by one fixed qwen3.5:9b reader under nine conditions: five graph routes, a recent-window baseline, whole-book compression, ordinary vector retrieval, and a question-only control. The strongest graph route reaches 53.85% (126/234) against 46.15% for the recent window, 51.28% for compression, 51.71% for vector retrieval and 40.17% for question-only. On the subset that no model can answer without the book, the graph route reaches 42.86%. None of the fifteen graph-baseline contrasts survives Holm correction, so we present the result as exploratory evidence about a design. Two structural findings survive scrutiny better than the headline number: annotated evidence concentrates in the topological core of these graphs (2.35x enrichment, pooled), and the two graph-building pipelines differ so much in annotation coverage (16% versus 73% of clue paragraphs) that pooled accuracy alone would hide which bottleneck is being measured.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
COT-TTS: Audio Context-Aware Text-to-Speech with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
CTRL: Control-Based Time Series Forecasting with LLM-Guided Residual Learning
LLaDA-PRM: A Bidirectional Step-Level Reasoning Evaluator
Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics
Analyzing Public Discourse on Urbanism: Topic Clustering, Sentiment Analysis and Retrieval-Augmented Generation using YouTube Comments
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.