arXiv preprint ·
Zero-Trust Authorization and Discovery for Enterprise MCP
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LLM agents translate natural-language context, which may include attacker-controlled text, into privileged tool calls, so authorization must remain effective even when an agent is prompt-injected or adversarially steered. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has become a widely adopted interface for this boundary, yet its official SDKs' authentication and authorization primitives fall short of enterprise zero-trust requirements, most acutely a dual-persona model in which one server must serve human users (corporate SSO) and automated agents (service-account credentials on a different header). We conduct a systematic gap analysis of six surveyed MCP SDKs (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, C#, Swift) and identify three structural shortcomings: credential extraction bound to a single Authorization header, complicating dual-persona deployment without custom middleware; the absence of pre-authentication tool discovery; and the lack of fine-grained per-tool authorization in the base SDKs. We close these gaps with composable extensions to FastMCP: cross-header credential normalization for enterprise deployments serving both human and service-account callers, cached token verification across heterogeneous IdPs, an unauthenticated metadata endpoint for credential-free registry discovery, and permission-filtered tool visibility kept consistent with per-tool invocation enforcement by a single declarative annotation, all without modifying the protocol or SDK internals. Across four frontier LLMs over 2160 attempts, an in-body-check-only server still exposes forbidden tools (152/720, 21.1%), whereas permission-aware visibility drives the rate to 0/720; visibility-only filtering remained bypassable by scripted clients, while models referenced the hidden tool by name in up to 94% of settings when inferable from the prompt, confirming that discovery controls cannot replace invocation-time enforcement.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Authorization Revocation for Long-Running AI Agents: Root-Scoped Quiescence under Delegation and Asynchronous Execution
From Capability to Assurance in Autonomous Penetration-Testing Harnesses: A Framework and Reference Implementation
Identifying Security Platform Product Abuse with Machine Learning
MATE: Policy-Aware Security Auditing for Mobile Agents via Synthesis-Driven Trajectory Learning
Conformal Privacy Auditing: Calibrated Re-identification Attacks with Statistical Guarantees
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.