arXiv preprint ·
Replication Without Persistence in Hosted LLMs: Measurement Sensitivity in Action-Time Belief Evaluation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Behavioural evaluations of hosted language models can vary because the evaluated service, the measurement instrument, or both differ across runs. We separate three validation questions: whether a prior finding recurs on fresh data under its historical configuration (replication), whether the endpoint changes when the evaluation-and-inference configuration is rebuilt under the same identifier (measurement sensitivity), and whether the finding persists across subsequently tested identifiers under one common instrument (persistence). We study these questions in Regent Chess, a sequential environment in which a hidden, mutable state is recorded exactly, allowing stated beliefs to be scored against ground truth at action time; positive endpoint values mean worse performance than a matched-uniform comparator. The previously reported Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite deficit recurs on fresh games under its historical configuration (+0.0530, 95% CI [+0.0329,+0.0714]). In a back-to-back same-day H/R comparison under the same public identifier, the model-minus-uniform endpoint is 0.0429 lower under the rebuilt configuration (95% CI for the H-minus-R contrast [+0.0182,+0.0667]); all six configuration components vary jointly, so no component is isolated. Under rebuilt R, the prospectively frozen, interleaved same-window 4K comparison reverses sign between Gemini 3.1 and Gemini 3.7, identifiers that differ in release and product tier; additional descriptive and exploratory cells show the same directional pattern. Any additional serving-period contribution remains unresolved (-0.0166, [-0.0483,+0.0157]). Replication, measurement sensitivity, and persistence can therefore yield different conclusions within one evaluation, motivating explicit indexing of hosted-model behavioural claims by tested identifier, serving period, measurement instrument, and inference configuration.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Not All Irregularity Is Equal: Causally Isolating a Rare Failure Mode in Japanese Morphological Inflection
COT-TTS: Audio Context-Aware Text-to-Speech with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
I'll Keep an Ear Out: Teaching AudioLLMs Proactive Audio Assistance
LLaDA-PRM: A Bidirectional Step-Level Reasoning Evaluator
When Better Turns Do Not Make Better Agents: Diagnosing the Gap Between Next-Turn Metrics and Workflow Success
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.