arXiv preprint ·
Social Influence and the Allocation of Scientific Attention in AI Populations
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
AI systems are becoming participants in the evaluation and use of scientific research. They encounter citation counts, download statistics and lists of popular articles developed around human readers, but the collective consequences of these signals for artificial readers remain uncertain. This paper adapts the Music Lab design to a market for academic attention. In the first experiment, 1,000 AI agents choose papers from the titles and abstracts of all 114 regular research articles published in the American Economic Review in 2025. The experiment has five independent-choice communities and five social-influence communities, each with 100 sequential agents. Only agents in the social-influence condition observe earlier selections within their community. Agents may select any number of papers. Social-information communities select 17.2 percent fewer papers per agent, concentrate their choices more heavily, and collectively cover 73 papers, compared with 90 independently. Between-community variation is greater under social information. In a second experiment with 200 agents across twenty social communities, randomly assigning papers five initial selections raises their subsequent selection rate by 45.55 percentage points (95% CI: 41.20 to 49.90). Choices have modest correspondence with external citations and little correspondence with download counts. The results show how a simple information rule shapes the volume, breadth and distribution of scientific attention in an artificial population.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Firm Valuation When AI Shapes the Business Model: A Milestone-Based Real-Options Framework for the AI Valuation Uncertainty Problem
A Dual-Process Perspective on Nudge Susceptibility in LLM-Based GUI Agents
Seeing Is Not Perceiving: When Synthetic Consumers Can and Cannot Pretest Visual Marketing
Whom Do AI Agents Work For? Role Assignment Induces Sponsorship Bias in LLM Recommenders
Sovereign Grassroots Currencies: A CBDC Architecture for Credit and Monetary Policy (Full Version)
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.