arXiv preprint ·
Behavior Trees for Robotic Systems: An Empirical Study on Practices and Experiences
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Over the last decade, behavior trees (BT) have become one of the dominant behavior models for coordinating missions of robotic systems. Yet empirical evidence on BT adoption in real-world contexts remains limited, especially regarding practitioners experiences and practices. Without practitioner-grounded evidence from both academic and industrial settings, the research community risks developing guidelines and tools that are plausible in principle but only partly aligned with real challenges. This scarcity of evidence leads to ad-hoc practices, impeding software reuse, maintenance, and evolution. This paper reports a mixed-methods study combining a technical action research investigation at an automotive company with a survey of 34 robotics practitioners. Our results indicate that BTs improve team communication and the understandability of robotic decision-making logic, reflecting BTs practical value beyond mission coordination. At the same time, practitioners face multiple non-trivial design and integration decisions, complicated by the lack of adequate guidelines and tool support. These decisions span architectural and language choices when implementing BTs and integrating them within ROS, for which we report observed patterns. Additionally, practitioners faced multi-factor granularity decisions and mixed experiences with current libraries. For the most used BT libraries, they reported implementation challenges and documentation gaps. Regarding planning algorithms, practitioners find deciding optimal BT node ordering challenging. Views on scalability remained inconclusive, and limitations in current libraries and practices hinder broader adoption. We conclude with cross-cutting observations and implications for both practitioners adopting BTs in robotic systems and researchers aiming to advance empirical understanding of BT adoption.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
SWE-Proof: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World Issues with Machine-Checked Proofs?
From Code to Requirements: Agentic Reverse Engineering of Business Rules at Enterprise Scale
Embedding Drift in Code Vulnerability Models Under Intended Behaviour-Preserving Transformations
Towards the Generalizability of Leveraging ChatGPT in APR via Self-enhancing: An Empirical Study
License Compliance in Open Source Cybersecurity Projects
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.