arXiv preprint ·
When AI Enters the Workplace, Who Faces Greater Risks? A Gendered Analysis
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Gender inequality remains a persistent structural feature of the labour market, shaping women's lifetime earnings and economic security. As artificial intelligence (AI) transforms organisational practices, there is growing concern that existing disparities may be unintentionally amplified through task automation, unequal access to upskilling opportunities, and differential returns obtained from technological change. In this paper, we examine how exposure to AI-driven innovation varies across male- and female-dominated occupations, with particular attention to differences across the skill and wage distribution. Using a novel dataset that links occupational characteristics to measures of AI exposure, we analyse how recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and broader AI technologies are distributed across the labour market. Our findings show that, while AI exposure is generally concentrated in higher-skilled and higher-paid occupations for male-dominated occupations, female-dominated occupations display relatively uniform levels of exposure across both high-skilled, high-paid, and low-skilled, low-paid occupations. Moreover, we find that LLM-related exposure is higher in female-dominated occupations, while exposure to broader AI innovation remains more concentrated in male-dominated occupations. A triangulation of these results with existing literature suggests that women, particularly those in the most vulnerable positions (lower-skilled and lower-paid female-dominated occupations), may face greater exposure to forms of AI associated with task automation, job restructuring, reduction of wages and limited career progression.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
AI-GRACE: A Use-Case Operationalization Framework for Agentic AI: From Organizational Objectives and Obligations to Deployment Capabilities and Architecture
When Disability Disclosure Travels: Memory, Privacy, and Contextual Integrity in Conversational AI
Your Programming Students' Cognition with ChatGPT: Higher Performance, Lower Retention, and Reduced Ownership
The Moral Check: Strategic AI Governance for the Pacing Problem
License Compliance in Open Source Cybersecurity Projects
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.