arXiv preprint ·
Cross-Platform vs Native Mobile Development: An Empirical Study of Software Quality Trade-offs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Cross-platform mobile frameworks promise code reuse, shorter delivery cycles, and lower implementation effort, but their trade-offs relative to native development remain difficult to assess objectively. Many comparisons rely on simplified applications, inconsistent feature sets, or a narrow set of metrics. This paper compares five implementations of the same plant-management application: native iOS, native Android, Flutter, React Native, and Kotlin Multiplatform. The shared approaches target both Android and iOS, yielding eight executable variants. Guided by ISO/IEC 25010, the study examines time behavior, implementation footprint, source-code organization, and observable rendering responsiveness. All implementations share the same domain, backend services, functional requirements, and benchmark contract. The supplied dataset contains 2,000 completed runs per variant and covers authenticated and cached retrieval, image transfer and decoding, list rendering and scrolling, local synchronization, and media upload. Backend preparation and framework-specific UI drivers are analyzed separately from the primary client workflow. Native records the lowest non-UI client subtotal on both operating systems, with Kotlin Multiplatform the closest cross-platform implementation, while operation and UI-wrapper rankings vary by task. The shared approaches contain less authored mobile source than the native applications combined, and the source inventory shows different patterns of file size, organization, and dependency use. Rather than identifying a universally superior technology, the study shows that each approach's advantages and costs depend on the quality attribute, workload, platform, and measurement boundary.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Hybrid GPU-CPU Retrieval for Personalized Search at Ultra-Large Scale
Measured Joules, Learned Routes: Learning to Route for Energy-Efficient LLM Serving
From Inference Engine to Inference Control Plane: Connecting vLLM, llm-d, and the Evolution of Efficient Distributed LLM Serving
The Weight Is Over - Interactive Diffusion on Consumer GPUs
Total Cost of Agency: Exact Attribution of Memory Injection Cost in Multi-Agent LLM Workflows
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.