arXiv preprint ·
An Empirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Coding harnesses shape how autonomous coding agents translate model capabilities into long-horizon software-engineering performance, yet existing work typically evaluates harnesses as monolithic systems, leaving the effectiveness of individual components unclear. To enable component-level comparisons, we study this question with a lightweight coding harness whose execution loop is fixed while three components are varied: planning, action space, and context management. Across four models evaluated on SWE-Bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1, we evaluate 176 matched settings spanning five context-management strategies, four context-window budgets, and targeted ablations of planning and action space. We find that: (1) Context management becomes increasingly valuable as the context-window budget tightens, with most of its benefit coming from preventing context-overflow failures. (2) Staging rule-based elision before LLM-based summarization provides the strongest overall efficiency among the context-management strategies, whereas making elided content recoverable adds machinery that models rarely use and yields no accuracy gain. (3) Planning shifts from an accuracy scaffold for weaker models to a cost saver for stronger models, with little change in accuracy. (4) Predefined tools improve performance for models with weaker bash proficiency, whereas bash-capable models can operate effectively with a bash-only interface and achieve substantially lower cost, especially on command-line-centric tasks. Trajectory-level analysis explains these effects: context management extends execution trajectories without substantially altering agent behavior, planning changes where trajectories stop, and the action space changes the granularity at which code is written. These findings inform model- and budget-aware harness design and provide a modular framework for evaluating future harness components.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
DeltaSelect: Affordable A/B Testing for Coding Agents
SWE-Proof: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World Issues with Machine-Checked Proofs?
The Output-Space Hypothesis: Enumerative Equivalence Checking for Tensor Programs
Embedding Drift in Code Vulnerability Models Under Intended Behaviour-Preserving Transformations
Semantic Layer Induction from Raw Telemetry via Hierarchical LLM and RAG Abstraction
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.