arXiv preprint ·
Improving Cross-embodiment Transfer in Latent Action Models with Action-Similarity Supervision
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
As generalist robot policies gain vision and language from web-scale pretraining, demonstrations remain costly to collect and tied to the robot that recorded them. Latent action models (LAMs) address both by learning latent actions from action-free videos that can be shared across embodiments, however, in practice, LAMs are sensitive to background visual noise, and the same motion from two different robots may be encoded with different latents. One solution to the background visual noise is to add an auxiliary loss predicting the robot action from the latent action, further associating the latent action space to the embodiment specific robot action space. We study a different use of the same labels, through action-similarity supervision. The similarity between any two latent actions is trained to match the similarity of the two ground-truth robot action sequences. The ground-truth actions are never predicted by the LAM, so the latent action does not need to encode embodiment specifics. We evaluate cross-embodiment transfer on RoboTwin 2.0 in a controlled setup, two bimanual robots demonstrate disjoint task sets, a policy is trained on all the demonstrations, and each robot is evaluated closed-loop on the tasks only the other demonstrated. With the policy architecture and its hyperparameters, the dataset, and the evaluation protocol fixed, predicting latent actions instead of ground-truth actions more than doubles cross-embodiment success. Given the same ground-truth actions, similarity supervision transfers better than an auxiliary loss that predicts the ground-truth action during the LAM training. Computing the similarities on end-effector motion rather than joint-space motion, and letting the loss compare latent actions across the two robots, gives the best approach of the study.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
CoreSense: Traceable Failure Recall and Conflict-Aware Belief Gating for Auditable Robot Decisions
MA-LIPP: Cooperative Multi-Agent Load-Aware Informative Path Planning for Heterogeneous Robot Teams
AMB3R-SLAM: Kilometer-scale SLAM with Hierarchical Backend
OpenRoIS: A Community-Driven Open-Source Middleware Implementing the Robotic Interaction Service (RoIS) Framework for Physical Robots and Virtual Agents
AURORA: A Natural Language-Driven Agentic Framework for Understanding, Reasoning, and Orchestrating Reliable Air-Ground Co-Simulation
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.