arXiv preprint ·
Well-posedness of neural turbulence closures and tangent dissipation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A neural turbulence closure defines a new boundary-value problem, $R(U)=N(U)+F(U)=0$, with a coupled Jacobian $J(U)=N'(U)+F'(U)$, where $N$ is the original mean-flow operator and $F$ the learned closure. We establish two consequences of global tangent dissipation. For a monotone original operator, a positive uniform margin supplied by the original operator and closure together guarantees existence, uniqueness and a global inverse-sensitivity bound relating a posteriori solution error to the a priori residual. For a general original operator, a dissipative closure cannot worsen tangent dissipation, but this alone does not guarantee uniqueness. Tangent dissipation depends on both diffusion and reaction. We study two complementary ways to promote it: (1) an exact-integral construction enforcing non-negative tangent diffusion while leaving reaction unconstrained, and (2) a penalty on tangent-reaction violations at sampled states. Tangent diffusion enters the Jacobian, and non-negative secant eddy viscosity alone does not control its coercivity. We conduct tests with channel flow at $Re_τ=180$--$5200$, which provides a strongly monotone baseline. Both constrained closures reach accurate solutions in all 50 training-seed/Reynolds-number cases. At $Re_τ=1000$, we conduct tests with 10,000 starts for one fixed network per closure and we find one root for each constrained closure and multiple roots for the other closures. Although this does not prove uniqueness, it provides strong empirical evidence for uniqueness of the tested constrained closures. At $Re_τ=5200$, the construction and penalty reduce the reported inverse sensitivity relative to the original operator by approximately $372\times$ and $11\times$, respectively.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Fluid Dynamics
Periodic Neural Mapping for Unsteady Rotor-Blade Pressure and Aeroelastic Load Prediction
How Does Distribution Shift Shape Pretraining Gains in Neural PDE Surrogates?
An improved periodic activation for PINNs reconstructing convective flows
Neural Field Ensembles for Aerodynamic Surface Prediction: Winning Solution to the ONERA CRM Wall Distribution 2025 Challenge
Learning Stiffness Dependent Fluid Structure Dynamics from Coarse Flow Representations
Get the few papers worth your time in Fluid Dynamics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.