arXiv preprint ·
Null importance: Disentangling relevance for interpretable machine learning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Feature importance is central to interpretable machine learning, but the term "importance" encompasses several fundamentally different notions of relevance. We develop a unified perspective based on null importance: a population-level characterization of when a feature is irrelevant under a specified notion of relevance. We consider standard notions of null importance arising from marginal and conditional statistical relevance, predictive risk, functional invariance, and causal effects, and show how these notions answer different scientific questions. We illustrate the framework in two applications in which the distinction is particularly consequential: algorithmic fairness, where common fairness criteria correspond to different notions of null importance, and genomic perturbation modeling, where different notions of relevance lead to different conclusions about what a prediction model has learned. The framework connects three aspects of feature analysis: the scientific question defining relevance, the data and model assumptions that shape how different null notions relate, and the methods used to assess importance. We establish sufficient conditions under which null notions coincide and give counterexamples showing how they diverge when those conditions fail. We then characterize which nulls different method families target and when their zero-importance statistics identify those targets. Finally, simulations spanning feature dependence, redundancy, nonlinearity, hidden features and other standard phenomena, along with case studies on image and multiomics data, provide empirical evidence for these theoretical distinctions and their practical consequences. Taken together, these results provide a common statistical language for relating scientific questions, data-generating assumptions, and algorithms, and clarify the conclusions that feature-importance analyses can support.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning (Statistics)
On the Identifiability of Mixed Ordinal and Exponential Family Causal DAGs under Linear Parametric Models
Next-token functional estimation
Matching Multi-Loop Complexities with a Single Loop: Optimal Optimization Stationarity and Best-Known Game Stationarity in Nonconvex--Concave Minimax Optimization
Compressed Active Subspaces for Scalable Bayesian Inference
Preservation of Log-Concavity and Convergence of Wasserstein-Fisher-Rao Gradient Flows
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning (Statistics) every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.