arXiv preprint ·
Looking Back and Forward: What Teaching Materials Do Not Remember About Instructional Reasoning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Instructional materials can be passed along to new instructors, yet the instructional reasoning, such as instructional intentions, contextual information, and reflective insights behind their design, is rarely preserved. Traditional Learning Management System (LMS) tools are designed to store instructional artifacts rather than reasoning. To address this issue, we propose Teaching Memory, a design approach that treats instructional reasoning as a primary form of knowledge. We present a design-oriented framework for preserving instructional reasoning in a lightweight manner within instructors' existing workflows, enabling continuity and reuse.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Large Language Model based air quality monitoring and localized alert generation
Funding the runners-up beats a golden ticket
Measuring AI Leadership: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure for AI-Native Organizations
Value Faces: Surfacing How Self-Presentation Shifts Across Relationships
Newer Is Not Fairer: Gender Stereotyping in Text-to-Image AI Across Model Generations
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.