arXiv preprint ·
Version- and Scope-Aware Question Answering over Normative Documents: A Deployed System and an End-to-End Evaluation at Production Scale
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Correctly answering a question grounded in normative documents often depends on information outside any single passage: whether the retrieved document is the version currently in force; whether it applies to the jurisdiction, subject (such as an institution or applicant), and date at issue; and whether each normative claim can be traced to its supporting source text. Hosted retrieval services have substantially lowered the engineering cost of building an initial system over such corpora, making "upload the documents and ask" a common default. We evaluate this default on approximately 73,000 candidate normative documents supplied to a production deployment. The evaluation uses a stratified sample of 200 questions from our published benchmark, with a gold source document for every question; the released sampling rule reads no system outputs or scores. We compare the hosted service with a governed system that resolves version and scope through explicit rules before generation. The governed system scored 97.7 overall, while the hosted service scored 88.1, a gap of 9.6 points computed from unrounded means. The question set, the answer text evaluated for both systems, the scores, and the scripts used to reproduce the reported benchmark statistics are public. The governed configuration has operated as a commercial product since January 2026 and serves 1,126 registered users; named customer organizations include Zhipu AI and Lecheng Health. By mid-April 2026, it had reached roughly 100,000 calls per workday.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
EDCT-Bench: Uncovering Faithfulness Gaps in VLMs via Explanation-Driven Counterfactual Testing
CoreSense: Traceable Failure Recall and Conflict-Aware Belief Gating for Auditable Robot Decisions
Measuring AI Leadership: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure for AI-Native Organizations
QVAC Genesis III: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Open Synthetic STEM Corpus for Efficient Language Model Pre-Training
Memory Has Geometry: Non-Uniform Geometric Memory for Long-Horizon Personalized AI
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.