arXiv preprint ·
Tracing individual knowledge trajectories in a changing field: the case of general relativity and gravitation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Historians have reconstructed the twentieth-century transformation of general relativity and gravitation (GRG) at the field level and through individual careers, but connecting these scales requires a way to compare researchers with the changing field over time. We develop such a comparison, setting a researcher's publications and references against GRG field literature from the same, earlier, and later two-year periods. Building on Own Vocabulary and Embedding Density Estimation from our earlier two-case study (arXiv:2501.00391), we extend the analysis to the fifty most-published authors in a NASA/ADS corpus of about 180,000 GRG records (1911 to 2000) and add two citation-based measures, Referenced Vocabulary and Citation Identity. The four measures compare an author's written language, cited literature, semantic neighbourhood, and cited-authority configuration with the surrounding field. The earlier cases suggested that closer field-vocabulary alignment accompanies a denser semantic neighbourhood. Across the fifty authors this holds only partially. Written and cited vocabularies tend to move together, usually resembling later GRG literature as the field turned towards astrophysical and cosmological research. Semantic neighbourhoods more often lie where the field's publications were concentrated in earlier periods, while co-citation patterns follow no single temporal direction, and the two citation measures frequently place the same researcher differently despite drawing on identical reference lists. Individual trajectories can thus combine vocabulary tied to later field states with older semantic or citation structures, and these divergent cases mark patterns for closer historical investigation. The approach transfers to other fields with defensible corpus boundaries and adequate coverage of texts, references, and disambiguated author identities.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Unbounded Operators, Physicality, and Modality in Quantum Theories
Geometric Signatures of Conceptual Reorganization: A Counterfactual Embedding Framework for Detecting Scientific Revolutions
What is Physics For? Why Classical Physics is not the Limit of Quantum Mechanics
Schrödinger's unpublished hidden-variable model in the 1944-45 debate over the "Collapse of Determinism"
On the relationship between the POVM framework and the no-signaling hypothesis
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.