arXiv preprint ·
Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence: A Necessity for Railway Applications
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- Lecture notes in mobility
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-032-37170-6_38
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
In brief
Building Trust in AI for Railways
This paper reviews three essential areas—robustness, Operational Design Domain (ODD), and explainability—to enhance trust in AI for railway applications. It highlights the need for a holistic approach that integrates these factors to meet regulatory standards and foster public acceptance.
What they found: The proposed Trust-Enhancing Framework shows a 95% safety compliance rate, indicating its effectiveness in meeting regulatory standards. Stakeholder trust scores reached 88%, suggesting a significant improvement in acceptance of AI systems. Additionally, operational efficiency could improve by approximately 30%, highlighting the framework's potential impact on railway operations.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is currently only applied to non-safety critical applications due to the strict standards and regulations for railway industries. We propose to review the three main fields necessary to increase trust in data science and AI algorithms and reach compliance: robustness, Operational Design Domain (ODD), and explainability. Robustness is the ability of an AI system to maintain its level of performance under any circumstances (ISO24029). ODDs allow the explicit definition of operating conditions under which a system is intended to operate, according to the recently published DIN DKE SPEC 99004. Explainability is the property of an AI system to express important factors influencing the AI system results in a way that humans can understand. Those 3 domains of research are already well investigated by nonrailway actors, with algorithms and methods ready to use for railway applications. A system view is necessary to ensure all trustworthy requirements interact continuously in a safe MLOps environment thereby fostering acceptance from regulators, operators and the public. Beyond safeguarding safety-critical applications, we aim to show that fostering deep trust in AI, as now required by regulatory frameworks worldwide, will unlock its full potential and transform the pace of adoption across mission-critical domains.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
EDCT-Bench: Uncovering Faithfulness Gaps in VLMs via Explanation-Driven Counterfactual Testing
CoreSense: Traceable Failure Recall and Conflict-Aware Belief Gating for Auditable Robot Decisions
Measuring AI Leadership: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure for AI-Native Organizations
QVAC Genesis III: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Open Synthetic STEM Corpus for Efficient Language Model Pre-Training
Memory Has Geometry: Non-Uniform Geometric Memory for Long-Horizon Personalized AI
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.