arXiv preprint ·
A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Quality Assurance Practices and Gaps in AI Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly used across software engineering, web automation, research, and productivity applications. Their integration of planning, memory, tool use, code execution, and external interactions enables greater autonomy but also introduces new reliability, safety, and security risks. We present a large-scale empirical study of quality assurance (QA) practices in 157 open-source LLM-based agent projects with at least 100 GitHub stars. We analyze documentation, source code, configurations, and tests to characterize QA practices across execution surfaces, safeguards, testing artifacts, risk scenarios, and recurring gaps. We find that current QA primarily focuses on basic functionality and high-risk actions, while coverage remains fragmented. Safeguards are inconsistently applied across equivalent execution routes, tests rarely examine boundary, adversarial, or multi-step tool-use failures, and identified risks are seldom translated into end-to-end QA checks. These findings highlight the need to move beyond feature-level testing toward systematic end-to-end validation that ensures agent workflows remain within intended boundaries when interacting with untrusted inputs, tools, persistent state, and external APIs.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Protocol-Preserving Context Trimming for Agentic Workflows: Benefits, Failure Regimes, and Budget Guardrails
A11yLTLNav: Automatic Detection of Accessibility Navigation Failures
AI Policies: Help or Hindrance? A Software Developer's Perspective
Experimental Settings in LLM-Based Program Repair: A Study of Inputs, Tool Access, Feedback, and Validation
ExecuCritic: Calibrated Critic Shaping for Code Generation with Verifiable Rewards
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.