arXiv preprint ·
Making Political Text Scaling Comparable: Infrastructure and Hyperparameter Sensitivity for 17 Algorithms
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Computational text-based ideal point estimation (CT-IPE) methods are usually compared as named algorithms, yet applying them involves numerous researcher choices that configure how political text is turned into position estimates. This paper argues that CT-IPE methods are better understood as configurable measurement pipelines than as fixed estimators. Building on a large-scale comparative experiment spanning 17 CT-IPE algorithms, 5,537 experimental runs, and approximately 4.25 million left-right position estimates, I describe the shared infrastructure that makes these heterogeneous methods jointly executable and quantify how sensitive their estimates are to alternative hyperparameter choices. Variance-partitioning and SHAP-based sensitivity analyses show that, for most algorithms, hyperparameter profiles explain little residual variance through a shared shift: 13 of the 17 algorithms exhibit ICC values below .10. Where this profile-level sensitivity is present, it is concentrated in a small number of consequential researcher choices, most notably the selection of the underlying language or embedding model, the seed keyword lists that anchor the construct, and the number of topics.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Learning to Refer from Estimated Listener Gaze
ModularRSI: Modular and Generalizable Recursive Harness Self-Improvement
Corpus Characterization and Inverse Constitutional Fine-Tuning for Style-Aware Radiology Reports
Dream-RSI: Recursive Self-Improvement through Evolving Worlds
The Attribution-Compression Frontier in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.