arXiv preprint ·
Coding Agents Have Converged: Why the SWE-bench Leaderboard Can No Longer Order Its Top Entries, and What to Measure Instead
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Small differences on coding-agent leaderboards are often read as an ordering of systems. We audit whether the published verdicts support this reading, using 254 SWE-bench submissions across four splits without running models. On Verified, the leading two entries each resolve 396 of 500 instances. The top ten share 285 successes and 51 failures, leaving 164 instances that distinguish their outcomes. Frontier solution sets have median nesting 0.935 against a score-implied baseline of 0.774, indicating strongly shared successes. Scores also depend on the evaluated model-scaffold pair: observed within-model scaffold ranges reach 29.8 percentage points, compared with the 8.8-point spread of the top thirty. Six of nine cell-mean interaction tests remain significant after Holm correction, although this observational design does not identify causal scaffold effects. Exact paired McNemar tests separate none of the 29 adjacent Verified top-thirty pairs at alpha=0.05, while the larger Test split separates 14 of 23. A stated leader-based rule yields three descriptive tiers, or two after Holm correction; non-rejection does not establish equivalence. We release the partition and a five-step audit protocol that profiles shared outcomes, tests paired differences, reports grouping sensitivity, and estimates the instance budget needed for resolution. The results motivate reporting comparison-set-specific resolution and model-scaffold provenance instead of interpreting small aggregate gaps as established rank differences.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Protocol-Preserving Context Trimming for Agentic Workflows: Benefits, Failure Regimes, and Budget Guardrails
A11yLTLNav: Automatic Detection of Accessibility Navigation Failures
AI Policies: Help or Hindrance? A Software Developer's Perspective
Experimental Settings in LLM-Based Program Repair: A Study of Inputs, Tool Access, Feedback, and Validation
ExecuCritic: Calibrated Critic Shaping for Code Generation with Verifiable Rewards
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.