arXiv preprint ·
A Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Fault Detection and Line Identification in Electrical Power Grids
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1109/ICASSP49660.2025.10890544
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Powering Up Fault Detection with ML
This paper evaluates various machine learning methods for fault detection in electrical grids, providing a systematic comparison that highlights their effectiveness. Notably, it establishes a benchmark for performance within a critical 10 ms measurement window.
What they found: The study found that the best-performing machine learning model achieved an impressive F1 score of 0.991, indicating its high accuracy in detecting faults. Additionally, it processed data within 0.342 ms, making it viable for real-time operations. This research highlights the potential of ML in enhancing the reliability of electrical grid fault detection, especially as renewable energy sources become more integrated.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
The integration of renewable energy sources into the electrical grid introduces complex challenges in fault detection and coordination of grid recovery mechanisms. Traditional relay protection systems, which operate based on static rules and predefined thresholds, are inadequate for addressing these challenges, particularly in detecting and isolating faults such as short circuits. Consequently, the conventional methodologies applied to electrical network protection frequently fail to achieve optimal performance in fault detection, especially in terms of adherence to safety standards and the selective limitation of damage. Recent research indicates that machine learning (ML)-based approaches can effectively tackle these issues; however, variations in grid configurations and analysis windows have impeded consistent comparative assessments. In this study, we assess the efficacy of various ML models in detecting electrical faults and pinpointing defective transmission lines within a 10 ms measurement interval - a critical time-frame for real-time operational viability, for the first time. The most effective model attained an F1 score of 0.991 +/- 0.018 and demonstrated a processing time of 0.342ms +/- 0.509ms.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Online Gradient Computation for Warping Gaussian Process Transformations
Beyond Direct Sensing: Harnessing Indirect Observations from Third-Party Sensors in Vehicle Tracking
Semantic CSI Feedback for Beam Selection: When Task-Aware Embeddings from Sparse Pilots Outperform Full-Bandwidth Reconstruction
Goal-oriented probabilistic forecasting for dynamic PRB allocation in 5G networks
Gradient Descent with Stochastic Subspaces via Persistence of Memory
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.