arXiv preprint ·
Style-Debiased DPO: Updating LLM Knowledge with Factuality-Aware Synthetic Preference Data
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Continued pretraining (CPT) with data augmentation such as paraphrasing can store inside a large language model (LLM) the knowledge of a small source corpus. The stored knowledge, however, is not always retrieved correctly. We study the eliciting side rather than the storing side: we use preference optimization, which learns from pairs of a preferred (chosen) and a dispreferred (rejected) response, so that the model elicits its stored knowledge more accurately. One proposed approach takes the model's own erroneous response as rejected and the gold answer as chosen, so as to suppress the error. When the target knowledge is partially known, however, most of these rejected responses are factually correct. Using direct preference optimization (DPO) then pushes down rejected responses that contain correct knowledge and differ from the chosen answer only in style, such as length and wording. We propose style-debiased DPO (SD-DPO), which scores whether the rejected response of each pair is factually correct, inverts the preference of such pairs, and weights them so that the learning signal due to differences in style cancels out as a whole. We first test whether, on top of EntiGraph, a representative storing-side method that runs CPT on text synthesized from the corpus, our method adds accuracy efficiently. On QuALITY, the reading-comprehension QA benchmark on which EntiGraph was evaluated, SD-DPO exceeds a baseline we CPT on EntiGraph's synthetic data from the same base model and evaluate with the same procedure. The training tokens this requires are a few dozen times fewer than the additional CPT needed for the same gain. For knowledge updating, the main goal of this work, we use AToKE, a knowledge-editing benchmark for facts that change over time. There, SD-DPO reaches an overall accuracy of 0.982 and answers with the new or the old fact according to the queried period.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Early-Bird Decoding: Accelerating Diffusion LLMs with Learnable Block Sizes and Parallel Sampling
ASPIRE: Asynchronous Batched Self-Speculative Decoding for Long-Context LLM Inference
Language Orthogonalization for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Audio Deepfake Detection
TACTICS: Taxonomy-Aware Intelligent Corpus Sampling for Machine Translation
Beyond the Name: Demographic Leakage in De-Identified Résumés and Evaluation Artifacts in LLM Bias Audits
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.