arXiv preprint ·
Anatomy of Associative Recall in Fixed-State Recurrences: A Matched-State Decomposition, an Interference Wall, and a Curriculum That Breaks It
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Fixed-state recurrences--linear attention and state-space models--are reported to lag behind attention on associative recall, but whole-architecture comparisons cannot say which ingredient is responsible. We decompose masked multi-query recall at a fixed state budget along three single-knob axes: a short causal convolution, the transition structure (rank-1 delta rule vs. diagonal), and decay. The convolution dominates (~+0.5 recall in both families under matched training): comparisons that pit convolution-free cells against a convolution-equipped Mamba measure the missing convolution, not the recurrence. The rank-1 transition beats its diagonal ablation by +0.19/+0.32 at 16/32 pairs, but the margin shrinks to +0.03 once both cells carry the convolution, and a state-matched Mamba-2 ties the unarmed rank-1 cell: no class claim survives. Cells that solve 32-pair recall degrade gracefully with load yet fall to chance retrieving 4 pairs from a distractor haystack--flat across lengths and transitions. Interference under sparse supervision, not capacity: a distance curriculum takes the unchanged architecture from 0.021 to 1.000. Training is a lock-in lottery--a seed either locks in or does not--and the curriculum is the lever. Lock-in rises from 1/10 to 7/10 (p=0.02); dense supervision adds nothing; at L=256 a shaped ramp reopens a boundary the uniform curriculum cannot (4/5 vs. 0/9); and at L=512, where the ramp collapses (0/6), gating it on measured accuracy locks in 6/6 (p=0.001). Bidirectional denoiser cells, reading the query before the haystack, show no measurable advantage over causal training (ten seeds), and collision-key retrieval needs two layers. Arming for recall is free on an S_5 state-tracking guardrail--the armed cell is significantly better at every depth (p<=0.0044). These replace "recurrent models are bad at recall" with a measured decomposition and two cheap interventions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
ModularRSI: Modular and Generalizable Recursive Harness Self-Improvement
Early-Bird Decoding: Accelerating Diffusion LLMs with Learnable Block Sizes and Parallel Sampling
Dream-RSI: Recursive Self-Improvement through Evolving Worlds
Language Orthogonalization for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Audio Deepfake Detection
One Example Is Enough to Pass Fairness Benchmarks: Rethinking Fairness Evaluation for Aligned LLMs
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.