arXiv preprint ·
Distilling Foundation Models for Agentic What-If Reasoning:Cost, Latency, and Governance in a Hybrid LLM+SLM Architecture
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Tabular foundation models deliver strong zero-training predictive performance via in-context learning, but their high inference latency makes them impractical as hot-path decision backends in interactive agentic loops. We distill a TabPFN teacher into a compact feed-forward student across a business-decision simulation on UCI Adult and five OpenML benchmarks: the classification head compresses 53.2M parameters to 8,546 (6,220x); the deployed two-head loan pipeline compresses 111.4M parameters to 17,059 (6,532x). The student retains 95.4-100.5% accuracy and 96.8-100.0% AUC, with the lowest accuracy retention on credit-g at 95.4%; an alpha = 0 hard-label control shows that the teacher's soft targets provide a 2.1-7.0 AUC point gain.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Semantic Fibers and Cross-Gram Interference: A Calculus of Safety Drift in Overcomplete Representations
Adaptive Bayesian Partner Selection for Federated Clinical Centers
GGUF-Metadata Prediction of Single-Sequence llama.cpp Throughput Across Three Systems
Decentralized Gossip Learning and Federated Averaging for Histopathology Image Classification
Interpolation Is Not Invariance: Pair Count Is Not Coverage in Transformation Audits
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.