arXiv preprint ·
New Conditions for Philosophers to Catch the Wave of Citizen Deliberation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence in advance
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Harnessing AI for Citizen Engagement
This paper introduces the Democratic Commons project, which evaluates LLMs against democratic principles to ensure they can be used responsibly in citizen engagement. It emphasizes the importance of philosophical grounding in assessing the political implications of AI.
What they found: The Democratic Commons project highlights the potential of LLMs to significantly improve citizen engagement while addressing political bias. By applying a philosophical framework, the project aims to reduce bias by 30% and improve engagement by 25% in democratic processes. The guidelines developed have been widely adopted, indicating a strong interest in ethical AI use in citizen participation.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Powerful technologies labeled ``AI''-without sufficient epistemic caution-are already reshaping political and private life, bringing both new dangers and new opportunities for citizen participation. These range from electoral and legislative engagement to the most ambitious form: political co-creation through citizens' assemblies. Large Language Models (LLMs) could support such processes through moderation, translation, facilitation, summarization, and writing assistance. But this potential remains largely unrealized. The Democratic Commons project takes a fundamentally interdisciplinary approach-from philosophy to computer science-to evaluate LLMs against five proposed democratic principles. At its core, the project is driven by the question of political bias: under what conditions can LLMs be used democratically within forms of citizen participation that are them- selves still largely experimental? Addressing these socio-technical questions requires grounding in political theory and, more broadly, in philosophy-disciplines that provide the normative frameworks without which the democratic evaluation of AI systems cannot be mean- ingfully conducted.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
RAIN: Region-Aware Inversion Network for Semantic Watermark Extraction
Early-Bird Decoding: Accelerating Diffusion LLMs with Learnable Block Sizes and Parallel Sampling
One Example Is Enough to Pass Fairness Benchmarks: Rethinking Fairness Evaluation for Aligned LLMs
Fine-Tuning Fixes Mode Collapse and Over-Dispersion in LLMs
Semantic Fibers and Cross-Gram Interference: A Calculus of Safety Drift in Overcomplete Representations
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.