arXiv preprint ·
Don't Send What You Don't Need: Question-Guided Token Pruning as a Privacy Defense for Vision-Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Visual Question Answering (VQA) with Vision-Language Models (VLMs) is increasingly used in privacy-sensitive and bandwidth-constrained settings. Federated Learning (FL), Split Learning (SL), and U-Shaped Split Learning (USL) keep raw data local, but transmitting all visual tokens across a model partition remains costly and can expose private information. We propose QPriv-VL, a question-guided, privacy-aware token-pruning framework for FL, SL, and USL that prunes visual tokens before transmission based on task utility and privacy sensitivity. Its core component is a lightweight Dynamic Threshold Predictor (DTP) that jointly estimates a sample-specific pruning ratio and a token-level retention mask in one forward pass. DTP combines question relevance, computed from cross-modal similarity between visual patches and the pooled question embedding, with a sensitivity signal derived from frozen DINOv2 features. This allows the model to suppress potentially sensitive regions while preserving patches useful for answering the question, without requiring sensitivity labels. We evaluate QPriv-VL on GQA, OK-VQA, VQAv2, SLAKE, VQA-RAD, and PathVQA against four privacy attack families: FSHA, FORA, iDLG, and attribute-inference membership inference attacks. DTP matches or outperforms fixed-ratio pruning while using substantially fewer transmitted tokens. On VQA-RAD, it reduces membership-inference attack success from 0.99 to 0.76-0.79, lowers FSHA and FORA reconstruction PSNR relative to fixed-ratio pruning, and preserves competitive VQA accuracy using about 40% of the original visual-token budget. A sensitivity exclusion ratio of 1.20 +/- 0.18 indicates preferential removal of privacy-sensitive patches, while explainability analysis shows that retention adapts to question semantics rather than generic visual saliency.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
ActGuard: Pre-execution Action Auditing against Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents
Not All Relations Are Equal: Relation-Balanced and Calibrated Graph Learning for Provenance-Based Intrusion Detection
PIDS-Bench: Evaluating Prompt-Injection Detectors Under Over-Defense, Obfuscation, and Distribution Shift
A Cyber Range Evaluation of Autonomous Network Incident Response Agents
Pick Your Poison: Learning to Select Poison Sets for Stronger LLM Backdoor Attacks
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.