arXiv preprint ·
CiteShade: Citation Laundering in Multi-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Its Counterfactual Defense
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds a language model's answers on retrieved external knowledge and returns each answer with citations that identify its sources. Those citations are the user's audit trail: they let a reader verify a claim without trusting the model. Prior security work on RAG asks whether an attacker can corrupt the answer, leaving the citation channel unexplored. We show that this channel is a new and practical attack surface. We propose CiteShade, the first citation laundering attack to RAG, in which an attacker controlling a single source induces a model to produce an attacker-chosen wrong answer and to attribute it to a trusted source that does not support it, while the evidence for the correct answer remains in context. We formulate the attack as an optimization problem, derive three necessary conditions (retrieval, generation, and citation) and construct sources satisfying them without any instruction. On multi-source multi-hop question answering the attack raises the wrong-answer rate from 0.01 to 0.68, and source deletion confirms the malicious source is the causal driver in every measured case. Vulnerability tracks a model's propensity to cite rather than its scale, reaching CLR 0.84 under explicit instruction and 0.64 with no instruction at all on the most citation-prone model tested. We then show that perplexity filtering and citation-support checking are each insufficient, and propose a counterfactual defense that verifies which source actually drove the answer.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
ActGuard: Pre-execution Action Auditing against Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents
Not All Relations Are Equal: Relation-Balanced and Calibrated Graph Learning for Provenance-Based Intrusion Detection
PIDS-Bench: Evaluating Prompt-Injection Detectors Under Over-Defense, Obfuscation, and Distribution Shift
A Cyber Range Evaluation of Autonomous Network Incident Response Agents
Pick Your Poison: Learning to Select Poison Sets for Stronger LLM Backdoor Attacks
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.