arXiv preprint ·
What a gated sensing pipeline never looks at: bandwidth reduction and the misses behind it
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
An airborne sensor on a contested link cannot send video, so the appealing move is to send findings instead and report the ratio between the two. We evaluate a gated sensing pipeline that does this, combining learned object detection and image-text comparison with deterministic scheduling, gating, evidence accumulation and transmission rules. On staged footage with the semantic stage live it sends 38,736 bits over 211 s, a reduction of 41,977x, and names 1 of 4 staged events with no false report. That detection has since been superseded: a correction to how the tracker measures speed removed the measurement artefact the normality model had been learning from, and the flight no longer warms. Under the corrected code the pipeline names 1 of 7 staged events across four flights, and we report both. On a control flight where nothing was staged it reports nothing, a reduction of 155,830x: the largest number in the study and the least informative, because a reduction ratio measures the scene. The mechanisms that produce the reduction also decide which observations ever reach a decision, so the two cannot be reported apart. We give a tick-level trace of one flight (3,187 rows) that places each of three missed events at the stage where it stopped progressing: one produced no track, one failed the structural place test at 0.129, and one passed 539 structural ticks but reached only 3.192 against a boundary of 3.807. We also report one instance of a known failure mode, an online normality model absorbing the object it will later judge, measured against the threshold that object then failed. The evidence is one detection and six misses across four staged flights, beside one clean control, and we treat it as a case study. We give the reproduction protocol and generated results, identify which supporting artifacts are not distributed, and state which experiments did not run.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
RAIN: Region-Aware Inversion Network for Semantic Watermark Extraction
Decentralized Gossip Learning and Federated Averaging for Histopathology Image Classification
Proximal-Only Transmission Matrix Recovery of an Arbitrarily Deformed Graded-Index Multimode Fiber
OPD-Aha: From Linguistic Momentum to Visual Reflection in Multimodal On-Policy Distillation
MedVA: An End-to-End Neuro-Symbolic Agentic System for Medical Volume Visualization
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.