arXiv preprint ·
Big Brains and Changing Environments: Cause or Consequence?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1145/3795101.3805275
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large brains are metabolically costly, and associations with changing environments do not imply they evolved there, as the Cognitive Buffer Hypothesis (CBH) would suggest. They may instead evolve in stable conditions and later facilitate colonization of changing environments. Using neuro-evolution in an artificial seasonal foraging task, we compared agents evolving exclusively in changing environments to agents first evolved in static environments before transitioning. Results show that larger neural networks in dynamic environments arise mainly from prior static evolution, achieving superior performance under unpredictable changes. Our results challenge strict CBH predictions, provide agent-based (computational) support for a colonization-based account and highlight the role of evolutionary history in brain size evolution.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Neural & Evolutionary Computing
The evolution of sex for artificial intelligence: a population-genetic framework for multigenerational model populations
NOC NOC, who's there? Clustering systems of tree-child and normal networks
Self-Replicating Neural Cellular Automata: Quantifying Emergent Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversity in an OpenEnded Substrate
BME-like Quartet Weights for Phylogenetic Trees
SAGE: A sampling-aware global evaluation benchmark for species distribution modeling
Get the few papers worth your time in Neural & Evolutionary Computing every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.