arXiv preprint ·
Don't Count the Edits, Judge by the Outcome Alone: Reward-Based Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correction
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Grammatical error correction (GEC) evaluation has traditionally relied on reference or edit overlap, which can penalize valid rewrites that differ from gold corrections. Reference-free metrics reduce this dependence, but evaluating whether a fluent output is a valid correction of the source remains challenging. We propose SURE, a source-conditioned reward evaluator trained on within-source preferences spanning minimal-edit and rewrite-oriented corrections. SURE jointly learns an overall reward with criteria-level supervision for grammaticality, faithfulness, and fluency, together with span-level grounding for source-side error resolution. Experiments on SEEDA show that SURE performs competitively against strong baselines, with particular gains on rewrite-style corrections and more disentangled criteria-level diagnostics. Our code is available at https://github.com/hayeonggg/SURE.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
ModularRSI: Modular and Generalizable Recursive Harness Self-Improvement
Early-Bird Decoding: Accelerating Diffusion LLMs with Learnable Block Sizes and Parallel Sampling
Dream-RSI: Recursive Self-Improvement through Evolving Worlds
Language Orthogonalization for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Audio Deepfake Detection
One Example Is Enough to Pass Fairness Benchmarks: Rethinking Fairness Evaluation for Aligned LLMs
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.