arXiv preprint ·
Rethinking Correctness for Uncertainty Estimation in Clinical Prediction with Vision-Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Vision-language models are increasingly explored for clinical prediction from electronic health records and medical images, where identifying unreliable predictions is important for safe deployment. Uncertainty estimation (UE) enables detecting such predictions, but its evaluation depends on a correctness criterion that determines whether each model output is correct. If this criterion disagrees with human judgement or distorts downstream UE performance, conclusions about model reliability can be misleading. We introduce a two-axis framework that evaluates correctness criteria by their agreement with human judgements and fidelity to human-referenced UE performance. We assess eight criteria across three clinical prediction tasks and three models using 450 predictions annotated by two reviewers. Across the audited tasks, canonical exact matching (EM) achieved the highest observed human agreement and lowest UE distortion, while the BERT-based matching (BEM) and LLM-judge also showed strong human agreement. Across four UE methods and 23,254 clinical predictions, criterion choice changed error-detection AUROC by up to 0.146 and reversed the relative ranking of UE methods. The LLM-judge also selectively accepted invalid or uncertain outputs, accepting 16 of 30 such human-identified errors. These results demonstrate that correctness assessment is an integral component of clinical UE evaluation and should be validated before UE methods are compared.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Semantic Fibers and Cross-Gram Interference: A Calculus of Safety Drift in Overcomplete Representations
Adaptive Bayesian Partner Selection for Federated Clinical Centers
GGUF-Metadata Prediction of Single-Sequence llama.cpp Throughput Across Three Systems
Decentralized Gossip Learning and Federated Averaging for Histopathology Image Classification
Interpolation Is Not Invariance: Pair Count Is Not Coverage in Transformation Audits
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.