arXiv preprint ·
Four Ledgers, Not One Score: Responsible Communication of LLM-Judge Calibration in Biomedical ML
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Synthetic perturbations appear to offer inexpensive calibration data for LLM evaluators in biomedical ML, where expert review is scarce. Yet a planted mutation key is neither a detector output nor automatically human ground truth. We formalize four distinct ledgers: planted perturbations, independent detector outputs, source-linked human dispositions, and human-added discoveries. We then audit the evaluation design, scoring code, read paths, and current human records of a private synthetic Japanese care-handoff workflow. The factory stored 69 planted error cards across 47 targets. Final review covers 22 targets and contains 22 confirmed imported proposals, 9 rejected proposals, and 79 human-added cards; only 3 reviewed targets are double annotated. Passing imported plant keys to a generic detector scorer yields 22/(22+9)=0.710 and 22/(22+79)=0.218. A direct audit identity shows that these values are proposal-confirmation yield and submitted-ledger composition, not judge precision and recall, because no independent detector realization was preserved for the audited proposals in the available records. The audit also finds source-name collisions, row shadowing, forced severity, vacuous ratio defaults, and unsupported zero-support field weights. We contribute a provenance-aware claim audit, a storage contract, and a minimum calibration gate for responsibly communicating biomedical ML capability claims. This single-workflow forensic case is an existence proof of a failure mode, not an estimate of its prevalence: existing human work supports an exploratory audit of synthetic proposals, but not LLM-judge operating characteristics, clinical validity, corpus prevalence, or robust inter-annotator agreement.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
RAIN: Region-Aware Inversion Network for Semantic Watermark Extraction
Early-Bird Decoding: Accelerating Diffusion LLMs with Learnable Block Sizes and Parallel Sampling
One Example Is Enough to Pass Fairness Benchmarks: Rethinking Fairness Evaluation for Aligned LLMs
Fine-Tuning Fixes Mode Collapse and Over-Dispersion in LLMs
Semantic Fibers and Cross-Gram Interference: A Calculus of Safety Drift in Overcomplete Representations
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.