arXiv preprint ·
EviQE: Evidence Selection for LLM-Based Query Expansion
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1145/3799682.3839965
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LLM-based query expansion increasingly conditions reformulation on documents retrieved from the target corpus, yet most work focuses on how to generate expansions rather than which documents the model should read. We propose EviQE, which aggregates documents retrieved by multiple reformulators, selects a compact evidence set, and uses it for one grounded expansion step. This separates evidence selection from generation and treats reformulators as complementary retrieval perspectives. Across three TREC DL and five BEIR benchmarks, reformulators frequently retrieve distinct relevant documents, so pooled candidates provide higher relevant-document coverage than any individual source. The strongest gains come from relevance-based evidence selection: LLM-Score consistently outperforms direct reformulation, cold-start expansion, and single-source seeded expansion. Additional retrieval-generation rounds provide little benefit once strong conditioning evidence has been selected and can reduce effectiveness.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
PCap: Personalized Retrieval-Stage Diversity Capping in Facebook Marketplace
Route Me If You Can: A Benchmark for Query Reformulation Selection
Predicting Partial Answer Quality and Utility in Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation
LazFormer: Scaling Transformers for Industrial Recommendation via Transferable Generative Pre-training
ReliGRec: Reliability-Oriented LLM-Based Generative Recommendation via User-Risk-Aware Prompt Routing
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.