arXiv preprint ·
Gate Design and Stage-Dependent Incentives in Retail Proprietary-Trading Evaluations: Why Passing Is Not Standalone Evidence of Skill, and Why the Product Fails to Pay Under Measured Trading Constraints
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Retail proprietary-trading firms sell a two-stage product: a paid evaluation that must reach a profit target before breaching a trailing drawdown, then a funded account that must survive a minimum window and a consistency rule before a payout. We show the geometry of this contract creates incentives that differ by stage and make passing a poor standalone signal of skill. Under end-of-day trailing the evaluation rewards a fast, lumpy cadence while the funded account punishes it, by a factor of nine in the joint gate. The evaluation is defeatable at zero skill: position sizing alone yields a pass probability near 0.40, against a measured cohort rate of 0.168. Pass probability rises with skill, but a real edge and aggressive sizing move it by nearly the same amount, so a pass rate confounds the two. Under a simplified contract model the seller's margin is bounded by the gap between perceived and actual gate probabilities, the probability analogue of shrouding a price component; the observed design, a permeable marketed evaluation and a hard payout gate, is consistent with that. Across the sector, pass rates are published far more often than payout rates. The same geometry produces negative expected value: within the measured strategy universe, no configuration at observed drifts clears break-even on any account sourced. Break-even lies between a 40.5% and 41.5% win rate at 1:1.5 net of costs, against a driftless 40.0%. The delta-neutral construction firms prohibit is approximately expected-value neutral at the observed payout ceiling. Every account-level result is reported against a zero-edge control.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Trading & Market Microstructure
Asymptotic Invariance of Kelly Allocation Under Power-Law Asset Dynamics: Evidence from Bitcoin
Clean Scores, Buried Evidence, and Confident Wrong: A Receipt-Based Audit of Frontier Agentic QA
HARN: Hierarchical Associative Resonance Network for Event-Driven Multi-Timeframe Forecasting
AI for AI: Optimizing Additional Infrastructure Build-out to Power Artificial Intelligence Data Centers
Prediction Markets Beat the Weather Forecast on Tomorrow's High Temperature
Get the few papers worth your time in Trading & Market Microstructure every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.