arXiv preprint ·
Patient-Level, Leakage-Aware Deep Learning for Cross-Center Periapical Radiograph Classification
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Dental caries and endodontic disease are among the most common health conditions worldwide, and intraoral periapical radiographs are central to their detection, treatment planning, and follow-up. Automated tooth-level classification of these images, however, lacks reproducible benchmarks, is often evaluated with image-level splits that leak patients between training and test, and is rarely validated across clinics. This paper presents the first patient-level, leakage-aware classification benchmark for single-tooth intraoral periapical radiographs on the DentIRO dataset, which comprises 5,300 images from 3,243 patients across two clinics and four classes: Healthy, Caries, Crowned, and Root Canal. Five transfer-learning models are compared with patient-grouped stratified cross-validation, so that every patient remains within a single fold. DenseNet121 gave the strongest and most stable result at a mean macro-F1 of 0.9787, while the four ImageNet-initialized backbones performed comparably. A controlled comparison on a fixed architecture showed that chest-radiograph pretraining transferred less effectively than ImageNet initialization. Bidirectional cross-center validation produced a small average generalization gap of 0.0077, and Grad-CAM confirmed that predictions rely on clinically meaningful tooth regions rather than acquisition artifacts. The benchmark offers a rigorous and reproducible baseline for intraoral radiograph classification.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Task-Specified Active Metrological Inspection with Measurement-Steered VLA Manipulation and Deterministic Evidence Gating
RAIN: Region-Aware Inversion Network for Semantic Watermark Extraction
What Input Resolution Is Required for Bird Species Identification, and What Is Its Latency Cost on an Edge Device? A Study of 14 Input Resolutions and Six Architectures with On-Device Measurements
Proximal-Only Transmission Matrix Recovery of an Arbitrarily Deformed Graded-Index Multimode Fiber
SPARK: Representation-Level KV Memory Alignment for Safer Vision-Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.