arXiv preprint ·
From Density to Biopsy Decisions and Malignancy Prediction: A Benchmark Study of Multimodal Large Language Models Against Radiologists in Digital and Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
To compare four multimodal large language models (MLLMs) with radiologists of varying expertise in breast density assessment, BI-RADS assessment, biopsy candidacy determination, and continuous malignancy probability estimation using digital mammography (DM) and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). Methods: This study included 179 women with paired DM/CEM examinations and reference standards. Four MLLMs (ChatGPT-5.2, Gemini-3.1 Pro, Sonnet-4.6, Muse Spark) interpreted images with and without masks; three radiologists interpreted non-masked images. Results: For binary density classification on DM, radiologist accuracies ranged from 55.81% to 78.60%, exceeding most MLLM values (62.33%-71.63%), while masks added limited benefit. Five-category BI-RADS accuracies were higher for radiologists on DM (56.74-67.44%) and CEM (62.33-82.79%) compared with MLLMs (DM 31.16-45.12%; CEM 40.00-55.81%). Binary biopsy-candidacy accuracies were likewise higher for radiologists (DM 85.12-89.77%; CEM 86.98-92.09%) than for MLLMs (DM 61.39-75.35%; CEM 69.30-82.79%), although CEM improved performance across all readers. Lesion masks substantially improved MLLM continuous malignancy-probability accuracies from 64.65%-71.63% to 72.56-78.60% on DM and from 67.91%-77.21% to 72.56%-81.86% on CEM, approaching radiologist ranges (DM 63.72-82.79%; CEM 81.86-88.84%). The corresponding AUCs for the top masked models overlapped those of the human readers. Overall, Muse Spark, followed by Sonnet-4.6, demonstrated the strongest performance among the MLLMs across domains. Conclusion: Radiologists generally outperformed MLLMs in categorical tasks, while selected masked models approached human performance for continuous malignancy probability estimation, suggesting a potential adjunctive role.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Video-Based Markerless Motion Capture for Clinical and Rehabilitation Biomechanics: A PRISMA-ScR Scoping Review of Validated Architectures, Clinical Readiness, and Emerging Methods
SV-Cine: Diagnosis-Conditioned Segmentation of Single Ventricle Physiology via Generative Data Augmentation
ORION-CMR: On-scanner Reporting with Integrated Foundation Model for End-to-End Cardiac MRI Analysis and Interpretation
A digital-twin framework for forecasting treatment-day imaging with contour uncertainty in adaptive proton radiotherapy
Towards Sustainable Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Insights from long-term, high-resolution energy recordings across an entire scanner fleet
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.