arXiv preprint ·
Evaluating Contextual Bias in CNN Image Classification: Evidence from Agricultural Benchmark Datasets
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are typically evaluated using held-out classification accuracy, an approach that presupposes predictions are based primarily on the intended object of interest rather than incidental surrounding context. We test this assumption in CNN-based agricultural image classification by comparing model performance on original images with performance on background-dominated patches extracted from the same images across eight publicly available agricultural benchmark datasets and four widely used CNN architectures. Background-dominated patches were classified above dataset-specific random chance for six of the eight datasets, and substantially above chance for four of them, indicating that contextual information contributes to model predictions for the majority of datasets evaluated. For these four datasets, we further evaluated whether this behavior reflected genuine class-discriminative information or was primarily attributable to class imbalance using macro-averaged precision, recall, and F1 together with class-balanced test subsets. The results show that contextual reliance does not admit a single explanation: class imbalance accounts for a substantial portion of the observed signal for some datasets and architectures, whereas above-chance contextual classification persists after balancing for others. Together with previous evidence from curated object recognition and cancer pathology imaging, these findings support the growing view that contextual bias is a recurring characteristic of CNN-based image classification rather than a phenomenon confined to a single application domain. More broadly, this work provides a systematic framework for quantifying contextual bias across heterogeneous image datasets by combining dataset-specific random-chance baselines, contextual bias categorization, macro-averaged evaluation, and class-balanced robustness analysis.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Task-Specified Active Metrological Inspection with Measurement-Steered VLA Manipulation and Deterministic Evidence Gating
RAIN: Region-Aware Inversion Network for Semantic Watermark Extraction
What Input Resolution Is Required for Bird Species Identification, and What Is Its Latency Cost on an Edge Device? A Study of 14 Input Resolutions and Six Architectures with On-Device Measurements
Proximal-Only Transmission Matrix Recovery of an Arbitrarily Deformed Graded-Index Multimode Fiber
SPARK: Representation-Level KV Memory Alignment for Safer Vision-Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.