arXiv preprint ·
Formal Properties of Language as Constraints on Neural Dynamics
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
What must a neural system be capable of to implement language? Current research annotates stimuli with linguistic variables and tests which electrodes, voxels, or language-model layers predict neural activity. Yet predictive success leaves mechanisms under-constrained. Here, we show that algebraic properties of language specify invariants that mechanisms must preserve: non-associative hierarchical grouping, commutativity, recursive closure, access to substructures, and structured workspace transitions. We term this the Neural Admissibility Program (NAP). Syntactic structure building is analyzed algebraically, with candidate mechanisms offered for each requirement: content-addressable workspace memory, graph-structured transient dynamics scheduling structure-building operations (e.g. stable heteroclinic channels), and a phase-coupled sealing operation recording grouping. Simulations show that a corrected Marcolli-Berwick entropy-optimized binding gate preserves grouping only within a narrow commitment band. As an alternative, we propose a novel neural binding operation we term 'Meld': two constituent populations converge through shared synapses, integrate sublinearly, and saturate. Meld is, to our knowledge, the closest neurally plausible composition law to syntactic Merge. It preserves every NAP invariant, uses known cortical operations, and recovers hierarchical structure at every tested depth and temperature. It predicts that effective population dimensionality separates alternative bracketings and that the composite depends on constituent disagreement. Importantly, the laws decoding bracketing most accurately are a priori inadmissible, showing that decoding accuracy alone cannot adjudicate between mechanisms. By specifying how neural dynamics can remain faithful to linguistic structure, the NAP changes the criterion by which neural implementations of cognition are evaluated.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Learning to Refer from Estimated Listener Gaze
ModularRSI: Modular and Generalizable Recursive Harness Self-Improvement
Corpus Characterization and Inverse Constitutional Fine-Tuning for Style-Aware Radiology Reports
Dream-RSI: Recursive Self-Improvement through Evolving Worlds
The Attribution-Compression Frontier in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.