arXiv preprint ·
Should Tables Be Sorted? Revisited with a Large Language Model
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We revisit the implicit membership problem in Yao's full-table model [Yao, 1981] and obtain, to our knowledge, the first quantitative improvements to his 45-year-old Ramsey bounds, most notably reducing the two-probe bound from tower-type to polynomial. In this model, an $n$-set $S\subseteq\{1,\ldots,m\}$ is stored as a permutation in an $n$-cell table, and queries decide whether $x\in S$. Let $G_q(n)$ be the largest universe size admitting a $q$-probe membership scheme for all $n$-sets. Yao determined the one-probe case exactly, proving $G_1(n)=2n-2$ for $n>2$, but the behavior for $q\ge2$ remained wide open. Fiat and Naor [1993] constructed schemes for universes of size $\exp(n^c)$ for some constant $c>0$ and sufficiently large constant $q$. For the first adaptive case, $q=2$, we prove $G_2(n)=O(n^2(\log n)^2)$. For every fixed integer $q\ge3$, we show that $G_q(n)$ is at most a tower of height $q-1$ with top $n^{1+o(1)}$; in particular, $G_3(n)\le\exp(n^{1+o(1)})$. The two-probe proof avoids Ramsey theory altogether; for larger fixed $q$, we use Ramsey theory only to make the first $q-1$ probes follow a fixed pattern, and then handle the last probe by the same non-Ramsey argument. Somewhat surprisingly, for each fixed $q$, we also show that implicit membership is as hard as implicit search up to a polynomial loss in universe size. Implicit search must return the cell containing $x$ when present and reject otherwise. For the analogous search threshold $H_q(n)$, we prove $H_q(n)\le G_q(n)\le n^q(H_q(n)+1)^{q+1}$ for every $q,n$. Thus, for every fixed $q$, one threshold is at most $\exp(n^{O(1)})$ if and only if the other is. The proofs were first generated by ChatGPT 5.5 Pro without mathematical hints; the membership-search equivalence emerged while pursuing an improved four-probe bound. The authors have validated and edited the proofs and assume responsibility for all content.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Data Structures & Algorithms
Prefix Sharing Is a Sorting Problem
A $(p+q)^{O(pq)}$-approximation for $(p, q)$-Flexible Graph Connectivity
Beyond Kruskal: Polynomial-Time Tensor Decomposition under the Lovitz-Petrov Condition
Sharp Norms from Finite Structure: Graph Matrices and Structured Chaoses
Tight Hardness for Temporal Path Covers at Vertex-Cover Number Two
Get the few papers worth your time in Data Structures & Algorithms every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.