arXiv preprint ·
An Uncertainty-Aware Hybrid Mathematical-Machine-Learning Model for Smart Irrigation Decision Support
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Agriculture accounts for roughly 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, yet irrigation is still commonly scheduled reactively, with no forecast of where soil moisture is heading and no statement of confidence in that forecast. Data-driven models are accurate but opaque and point-valued; water-balance models are transparent but carry large structural error. Neither alone supports a defensible irrigation decision under uncertainty. This study coupled the two and carried uncertainty through to the decision: a four-parameter water-balance core, calibrated on training data only, was corrected by a Random Forest that learned nothing but the physical residual, conformal prediction attached 90%-nominal intervals, and a risk-aware rule converted the interval lower bound into an irrigation trigger. It was evaluated on three years of hourly in-situ measurements from a rainfed Mediterranean cropland station under a strict chronological split, scored against persistence, from one hour to one week. At the 24 h horizon the hybrid reached RMSE 0.00925 m^3 m^-3 and +9.4% skill, roughly double the best of nine baselines, of which only the Random Forest beat persistence. Skill did not grow with lead time: it peaked at +27.4% at three hours and fell to +1.2% at one week. Conformalised quantile regression was better calibrated and 11% sharper than constant-width conformal prediction. The risk-aware rule raised management-threshold crossings detected in advance from 0.905 to 1.000, at a precision cost of 0.975 to 0.950 and 3.7% more notional water, and beyond 72 h the point forecast fell below the no-forecast rule while the interval-based rule did not. Uncertainty quantification therefore governs the lead time over which forecast-driven irrigation advice remains trustworthy, and here transparency in the physical layer cost no measurable accuracy.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Issue Bias in Generative AI Writing Assistance: Political Issues and LLMs in the Swedish 2026 Election
Beyond Point Forecasts: A Survey on Probabilistic Forecasting for Time Series and Spatiotemporal Data
Predictive Likelihood Ratios for Language Model Watermark Detection
Buyer Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Environmental Governance and Supplier Environmental Controversies: An Organizational Information Processing and Signaling
Multisource Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis of Vineyard Wildfire Impacts and Resilience: The 2019 Kincade Fire
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.