arXiv preprint ·
Accuracy Is Not Service: A Decision-Aware Benchmark for Intermittent-Demand Forecasting
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A contract-logistics spare-parts operator is paid on order-level service: an order counts only if every requested line is fulfilled, yet forecasters are selected based on line-level forecast accuracy. This disconnect matters when demand is intermittent and lumpy, histories are short, and lead times span months. We benchmarked 38 forecasting methods spanning classical, intermittent-demand, machine-learning, deep-learning, and pretrained foundation models. A common decision-aware protocol evaluates them on an industrial panel drawn from a live contract and two public datasets. Forecast-accuracy rank and order-service rank are negatively correlated on the industrial panel, at -0.555, across methods evaluated on 20,330 real multi-item orders. Service is more closely associated with the direction of cumulative forecast bias, including over-prediction during zero-demand periods, than with point accuracy. Examining bias in Chronos-2's instance normalization yields a training-free correction that lifts the per-material fill proxy from 77.5% to 92.0% (14.5 percentage points) at the 90% policy target and raises the complete-order fill rate from 54% to 63%. For reproducibility, we release RUF (Regenerate-Until-Fidelity), a method for generating fidelity-certified synthetic panels on which the findings reproduce. For intermittent demand, the lowest-error forecast need not deliver the highest service. Bias direction helps explain this gap, which can be reduced without retraining.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
An Efficient and Modular Framework for Targeted Harm Mitigation in LLMS
Partition-Aware Scheduling for Mobile Heterogeneous Inference Co-Execution
EI-DDLGN: Efficient Encrypted Inference with Deep Differentiable Logic Gate Networks under TFHE
Graph-Transformer Fraud Detection with Self-Supervised Pretraining and Conformal Risk Control
FlowTSFM: Turning Encoder Depth into Quantile Transport
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.