arXiv preprint ·
DARE: Dialectical Agentic Reasoning for Structured Knowledge Fact Checking
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Structured knowledge fact checking aims to determine the truthfulness of natural language claims by reasoning over structured evidence. Recent program-generation approaches leverage large language models (LLMs) to generate executable graph reasoning programs, achieving strong performance on structured knowledge fact checking benchmarks. However, these methods remain limited by invalid relation generation, single-path reasoning that lacks self-correction, and biased evidence assessment that tends to overestimate supporting signals. We propose Dialectical Agentic Reasoning (DARE), a multi-agent framework that formulates structured knowledge fact checking as an iterative retrieve-reason-reflect process. DARE integrates relation-grounded evidence retrieval to constrain reasoning to valid structures, dialectical bidirectional verification to evaluate evidence from both supporting and refuting perspectives, and confidence-driven meta-reflection to dynamically determine whether additional evidence exploration is necessary. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of DARE in structured knowledge fact checking, with an 8B backbone achieving 88.12% accuracy and matching or surpassing GPT-4o-based program-generation baselines, which attests to the efficacy of dialectical agentic reasoning in eliciting the latent reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
The University of Melbourne WMT 2026 CreoleMT Submission: A Domain-Balanced Approach to Low-Resource Pacific Creole Machine Translation
Learning to Refer from Estimated Listener Gaze
An Efficient and Modular Framework for Targeted Harm Mitigation in LLMS
Corpus Characterization and Inverse Constitutional Fine-Tuning for Style-Aware Radiology Reports
FaithfulBench: Does AI Counsel Uphold or Undermine the User's Professed Faith?
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.