arXiv preprint ·
Fewer Words, Not Fewer Tokens: Measuring the Sanskrit Tokenization Penalty per Proposition
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Sanskrit fuses case, number, person and tense into word endings and chains clauses into compounds, so it is information-dense per word. Whether that density survives subword tokenization is a separate question, to be asked per unit of meaning rather than per word. On identical FLORES-200 devtest content, Sanskrit costs 1.774-2.187 times the English tokens under deployed tokenizers with vocabularies of 200,019 ids or more, but only 1.325-1.353 times the Hindi tokens. Against a deployed English tokenizer, Sanskrit-trained BPE arms then look cheaper per proposition than English on contemporary prose (0.887). Against a matched English control, the same algorithm and vocabulary trained on the English side of the same corpus, that flip disappears: at 32,000 and 64,000 pieces all 8 matched pairs, each size-matched arm against both a pair-matched and a byte-matched control, sit above 1.0 on prose with 95% intervals excluding it. The gap closes as the vocabulary grows: at 128,000 pieces the BPE pair reads 0.983 in domain while staying above parity out of domain (1.025) and on FLORES (1.116). The ratio factorises into a character-length ratio and a tokens-per-character ratio, the second near 1 throughout: what survives matched tokenization is character-level length, which Sanskrit prose lacks over English in SLP1 (1.028) and Sanskrit verse has (0.596). The robust statement is about deployed practice: on contemporary prose and on FLORES, with the Sanskrit side in SLP1 against the deployed o200k English pivot, Sanskrit costs 1.831-2.899 English tokens per proposition under the tokenizers people actually ship. Code, the results snapshot and every table here are public.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Breaking the Token Ceiling: Distilling Smaller, Stronger Byte Models
The University of Melbourne WMT 2026 CreoleMT Submission: A Domain-Balanced Approach to Low-Resource Pacific Creole Machine Translation
ESTS at WMT26: Routing-Informed Expert Pruning for Model Compression
An Efficient and Modular Framework for Targeted Harm Mitigation in LLMS
I Am No One: Style-Aware Paraphrasing for Text Anonymization
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.