arXiv preprint ·
Same Encoder, Different Winner: A Paired-View Framework for Cell Painting Encoder Evaluation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Vision encoders for Cell Painting are typically ranked by a single evaluation, commonly replicate mean average precision (mAP). We introduce CP-BG-Bench, a paired-view evaluation framework that holds the central cell fixed across four matched views (raw crop C, segmented S, and density-augmented variants CD and SD), ablating or augmenting surrounding pixels as a controlled intervention. Instantiating the framework on three datasets (JUMP-CP, RxRx1, RxRx3-core) and three encoders (DINOv3 ViT-B/16, OpenPhenom, SubCell) under four community-standard protocols (replicate mAP, scIB batch integration, CellProfiler feature prediction, cross-batch perturbation recall), we find that the four protocols rank the same encoders systematically differently, with disagreements decomposing along three axes: cell versus background, morphology versus context, and within-study versus across-batch. The largest effect: on RxRx3-core, SubCell with segmented inputs retains 94% of crop replicate mAP but only 32% of crop R@10, so the within-study signal preserved under segmentation is largely non-transferable; density augmentation recovers 84% of the within-study C-to-S gap but only 8% of the cross-batch gap. Segmented views predict CellProfiler features as well as or better than crops on two of three datasets, inverting the replicate-mAP ranking, and the C-to-S gap varies by an order of magnitude across datasets while remaining similar across encoders, indicating that background-driven gain is set by experimental design rather than by the encoder. Single-metric ranking of Cell Painting encoders is therefore sensitive to the protocol used, and protocol disagreements are interpretable as projections onto the three axes the paired-view design exposes. We will release the paired-view datasets, reconstruction pipelines, 36 trained checkpoints, aggregated embeddings, and the full evaluation suite.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
An immune world model for multiscale forecasting and therapeutic hypothesis generation
Biology-in-the-loop: Amortized Adaptive Hit Discovery in CRISPR Screens
Knowledge-Enriched Structured EHR Features for 30-Day Hospital Readmission Prediction on MIMIC-IV
HypoKG: Evidence-Disciplined Biomedical Hypothesis Generation Beyond Endpoint Knowledge
Optical microelectrode arrays for differential readout of electrical and mechanical signals in cardiac cells
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.