arXiv preprint ·
Temporal Recurrence Favors Fewer Layers
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In streaming tasks, recurrent models can carry latent computation across time, allowing each update to build on representations produced earlier. This raises a basic question: once temporal recurrence provides sequential computation across steps, how much depth is still needed within each step? Prior work has shown that recurrence can make shallow models competitive. We instead study this question as a compute-allocation problem, varying within-step depth, expert width, and the number of parallel experts per layer across several compute budgets. For each budget, we compare the best observed recurrent and non-recurrent allocations and the performance they achieve under approximately matched per-step computation. Across Sokoban and autoregressive FineWeb language modeling, we find that temporal recurrence shifts the best observed compute allocation toward substantially fewer layers, with comparable or better performance.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
FRIST: FMRI Representation Informed Shared-space Training Improves EEG-only Individual-Finger BCI Decoding
An Efficient and Modular Framework for Targeted Harm Mitigation in LLMS
Breaking the Token Ceiling: Distilling Smaller, Stronger Byte Models
EI-DDLGN: Efficient Encrypted Inference with Deep Differentiable Logic Gate Networks under TFHE
Self-Verifying Anomaly Detection using Explainable AI for Cybersecurity of DER Networks
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.