arXiv preprint ·
Large Signal Libraries: Equal-Weight Limits and the Divergent Spectra of Signals and PnL
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
An ensemble of roughly 3,000 signals over 20 assets was reported to have approximately 90% correlation with the leading component of the asset-space return structure. Does having about 158 signals per available linear dimension explain that alignment? The population answer depends on the research process's design distribution and its relation to returns: crowding alone imposes neither a nonzero mean nor agreement with a principal component. The population theory developed here distinguishes four objects: the equal-weight signal, signal principal components, equal-weight profit and loss (PnL), and PnL principal components. The return operator in the motivating observation is a separate object. Independent libraries converge to their design mean; exchangeable libraries can retain a random conditional mean. Cross-sectional signals over $d$ assets, once demeaned and normalized, lie on the unit sphere $S^{q-1}$ of a $q$-dimensional space, $q=d-1$. Under axial symmetry, their nonzero mean is signal-cloud PC1 exactly when its longitudinal second moment exceeds $1/q$, the isotropic energy share. Residual-and-gap bounds quantify approximate alignment. Combining design weights into signals contracts the tangent of their angle to PC1 to at most $\sqrt{λ_2/λ_1}$ times its value, where $λ_1>λ_2$ are the leading signal-kernel eigenvalues; the factor is sharp. A target-aligned frame separates transverse signal geometry, which PnL discards, from dispersion weighting and temporal centering, which also change the spectrum. A reproducible synthetic example illustrates the geometric threshold, and a proposed empirical program separates library growth from limited-history estimation. No market-data empirical results are presented.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Portfolio Management
Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance
Diffusion models for dynamic volatility surface generation and data-driven hedging
Separated Signal Libraries: Packing, Saturation, and Joint Spectral Limits
Entropic Value-at-Risk parity for tempered stable returns
Principal component error in high-dimensional factor models
Get the few papers worth your time in Portfolio Management every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.