arXiv preprint ·
IMPLY: Physically Anchored Consistency for World-Model Rollouts
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A world model asked what happens if an object is pushed at several speeds produces several futures. If the model has the object in mind, those futures agree about it: each implies the same mass and friction. The consistency checks now used to vet world-action models ask whether a model's futures agree with each other, and none of them knows any physics. We show that this is not enough, and what to do instead. IMPLY reads the physics each rollout implies by inverting a simulator and scores a set of rollouts by how well one object explains all of them, anchored to two calibration pushes the model has observed. In a controlled setting, self-consistency gives a perfect score to a model that ignores the object and always predicts a typical push; anchoring exposes it (AUROC 0.70 versus 1.00). On a real model, V-JEPA 2-AC adapted to the scene, the same thing happens. Given its own calibration pushes the model tracks the object (per-object correlation with the truth 0.91); given another object's, it does not (0.05). Self-consistency cannot tell these apart, preferring the right evidence on 52% of objects, chance level, while anchored disagreement prefers it on 73% and correlates 0.92-0.99 with the rollouts' error. Used to choose among candidate rollout sets, it comes within 0.003 of an oracle that sees the truth. A model that has internalised the wrong object is exactly as self-consistent as one that has internalised the right one; consistency has to be anchored to evidence.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
DATAFARM: Distribution-Aligned Task and Motion Planning for Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models
How Well Do Pseudo-Rigid Body Models Capture Real Plants? In-Field Validation of Simulated Blueberry Canes
The Iterative Equivariant Filter
Compositional Shift Algebra: Extrapolating Mixed Robot Shifts Without Mixed Finetuning
DWMP: Leveraging Dual World Models for Humanoid Obstacle Traversal
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.