arXiv preprint ·
Can LLMs in Draft-Verify-Revise Pipelines Resolve Deictic Ambiguity?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Draft-verify-revise is a common LLM orchestration pattern for scaling inference-time compute. One LLM drafts, a second critiques the draft and provides feedback, and a third uses that feedback to revise the draft into the final output. As context cascades between stages, LLMs at different stages can resolve a context-dependent expression such as "previous" differently. When that happens, the expression undergoes a deictic shift, a change in what it refers to. This phenomenon was studied with a synthetic dataset of 10 base examples, each rendered in three conditions. Holding the shared components constant, the conditions varied whether the draft stage LLM (the assistant) or the verify stage LLM (the grader) resolved the expression correctly, and how much independent reasoning the revise stage LLM (the meta-evaluator) needed to determine which reading was correct. Six models from three providers were tested across 21 reasoning effort configurations using e-values for sequential testing, in a primary experiment and an ablation experiment that removed error classification labels from the grader's feedback. A separate LLM analyzed the meta-evaluator's stated rationale for each wrong verdict. Balanced accuracy (the unweighted mean of sensitivity and specificity) ranged from 0.156, below chance, to near-perfect. GPT-5.2 rose from 0.156 without reasoning to 0.942 at its highest reasoning effort level, while Gemini 3 Pro stayed above 0.94 at every level. Gemini 3 Pro at low reasoning effort outscored GPT-5.2 at xhigh reasoning effort for roughly 5% of the cost per trial. When the meta-evaluator erred, it tended to rely on surface cues rather than operational reasoning. Context engineers implementing draft-verify-revise pipelines should be wary of deictic shifts and make the intended referent explicit at each stage.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Auto-RecSys: Harnessing Autonomous Research Agents for Industry-Scale Recommender System
Breaking the Token Ceiling: Distilling Smaller, Stronger Byte Models
Structurally Speaking: Motif-Oriented Graph Captioning through Bidirectional Graph-Text Translation
ESTS at WMT26: Routing-Informed Expert Pruning for Model Compression
Using Semantic Uncertainty to Estimate Transition Relevance in Turn-taking
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.