arXiv preprint ·
Recognizing Is Not Reversing: A Controlled Inversion Test of Fact-Preserving News Framing
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to analyze and rewrite news, yet current framing studies mainly evaluate generation, detection, or whether rewritten text appears more neutral. They do not directly show whether a model can undo a known framing transformation while keeping the facts fixed. We introduce a controlled inversion test over three established textual realizations of framing: evaluative lexis, agency realization, and information salience. Across 60 news articles and three intervention strengths, this yields 540 paired variants with preserved atomic facts and recorded edits. Across Qwen, DeepSeek, and Kimi, factual preservation remains near 0.84, whereas intervention reversal is 0.044--0.068. Even when both framing type and direction are recognized correctly, pooled reversal reaches 0.071. These results reveal a clear separation between factual fidelity, framing recognition, and framing inversion: recognizing how an article is framed does not imply that the framing can be undone.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Auto-RecSys: Harnessing Autonomous Research Agents for Industry-Scale Recommender System
Breaking the Token Ceiling: Distilling Smaller, Stronger Byte Models
Structurally Speaking: Motif-Oriented Graph Captioning through Bidirectional Graph-Text Translation
ESTS at WMT26: Routing-Informed Expert Pruning for Model Compression
Using Semantic Uncertainty to Estimate Transition Relevance in Turn-taking
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.