arXiv preprint ·
Characterizing Bluesky Content Moderation Service: From Automation of Service to Landscape of Harms
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Empirical research on content moderation is fundamentally constrained by the opaque deployment of moderation systems on major social media platforms. To this end, the recent emergence of decentralized platforms with transparent, public moderation logs presents an unprecedented opportunity for independent audits. In this work, we leverage this architectural transparency to conduct the first large-scale audit of the default moderation system on Bluesky, the Bluesky Moderation Service (BMS). Analyzing its 10.6M moderation labels from 2025, we investigate three foundational aspects: (i) its mechanism (the degree of automation versus human oversight), (ii) its efficacy (accuracy in detecting harms), and (iii) its purpose (the landscape of harms it identifies). Our findings reveal a human-AI collaborative system where labels for sexual and graphic content are applied automatically in seconds, while nuanced and high stakes labels require more human oversight, taking hours or days. Through a manual annotation study, we find the BMS operates with high precision (0.837), but struggles with low recall (0.222), with our annotators identifying 4.5$\times$ more harmful content than the moderation system in a random sample. Finally, unsupervised clustering of the most frequently applied labeled posts uncovers detected harms ranging from hostility in discourse toward protected groups to the spread of sexually explicit and other graphic content. Our work offers a look into the operational realities of a deployed moderation system, providing a concrete data-driven foundation for designing more effective and transparent moderation systems.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
terms.txt: A Consent and Compensation Protocol for Agentic Web Access
When Does AI Augment Work? A Workflow-Level Framework for Human-Agent Collaboration
(Whose defaults?) Is artificial intelligence reorienting archaeological methods?
ARC: Autonomous Robotics Compliance A Three-Layer Governance Architecture for Deployed Autonomous Systems
SoulAuth: An Actor-native Identity Architecture and Rust Reference Implementation for Humans and Long-lived AI Actors
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.